Posted by
aqvik on Saturday, November 11, 2006 2:10:50 PM
There is NOT much optimism in many circles about the new leadership in Washington, but the truth is, there wasn’t much reason to be sanguine about the old leadership either. They were so frustratingly dense about some very clear and simple common sense items. My father always said, “Don’t start a fight, but if you can’t avoid it, give it all you’ve got.” I don’t think invading Iraq
was a good idea, given how we’ve mishandled it by not using
overwhelming force, but it’s not too late to change the course of the
war in our favor. Or is it? We are a representative democracy, and it’s
possible to read the midterm election results as a war veto by the
American people, but is that correct? Only 41% of eligible voters
actually went out and exercised that right, and I don’t think it’s
accurate or possible to then say that we are vehemently opposed to the
war. What I believe, in hindsight, is that we are vehemently opposed to
losing the war. The message that was sent was, “Hey Washington, either win or get out. Enough of this half-way stuff.”
That may not have been the right message, but maybe, again in hindsight, it was the only
message that would have been heard in the halls of government. The hope
is that collectively, we are by the grace of God, wiser than we are
individually. But the jury is most assuredly out on that verdict.
What is clear is that if we don’t show intolerance for those who want to kill us, and tolerance
for those who don’t, the American people are going to be victims of the
age-old “divide and conquer” strategy. The key, of course, is to
accurately discern who the enemy is, and isn't. I’m hoping that we do
that as a nation without relying on imperfect hindsight.